• Max Christie

Climate Action by Court Order? Environmental Jurisprudence Explained

Updated: Jul 7

By Max Christie

Activists and organizations aim to push for climate policy changes through the political system. Whether by voting for eco-friendly politicians or pressuring officials already in office, these methods have been commonplace in environmental circles for decades. However, in recent years some organizations have used a different tactic for pushing governments and corporations to curb their environmental impact; instead of exerting pressure on politicians in Parliament, activists and organizations are putting pressure on judges through the judicial system (1). This doctrine of “environmental jurisprudence” argues that since climate change poses a significant threat to rights to life, liberty, and property, inaction to combat climate change is the equivalent to denying people such rights (1). Moreover, governments have a legal obligation to reduce the effects of climate change as much as possible (1). Such activism has found some success in recent years, with the most notable case coming in 2015 when the Dutch government was ordered to reduce national CO2 emissions to 25% below 1990 levels by the year 2025, compared to the government’s previous plan of a 17% reduction (2). This success in environmental litigation has led many to wonder if a similar ruling could occur in Canada (3). However, despite the appeal of forcing governments to implement effective climate policy through the courts, there are many hurdles that make this strategy ineffective.

While the Dutch case was a particular example where the courts sided with activists, this may not be the outcome with every judicial system. For example, the United States, which has more climate change litigation than the rest of the world combined, has courts that favour corporations and governments in many cases when it comes to environmental lawsuits (4). In perhaps the most important case for this particular brand of jurisprudence – American Electric Power Company v. Connecticut – the US Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the judicial system does not have the power to supersede federal law when it comes to the environment (5).

Closer to home, the Canadian Supreme Court has previously ruled that Parliament is sovereign when it comes to legislation, including a recent ruling that the Government of Canada is not legally obligated to consult First Nation communities with regard to environmental legislation (6). This ruling, coupled with the fact that Canadian courts often “borrow” legal concepts from the American legal system (as well as British law, which also upholds parliamentary sovereignty), means that courts would not be able to interfere with any particular governmental climate change strategy or lack thereof (7).

So, is a ruling similar to what happened in the Netherlands possible in Canada? With the evidence presented, it seems unlikely, and although the courts are useful for making sure existing environmental law is followed, we cannot rely on judges to mandate that climate action is taken (8). Such action is the job of politicians and governments, and that is why it is important for climate activists to continue their pursuit of climate justice through the political system. By influencing the instruments of government, climate activists can work to build agreement amongst politicians, institutions, and citizens in pursuance of an eco-friendlier future.


(1) https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/mar/20/can-climate-litigation-save-the-world

(2) http://www.urgenda.nl/documents/VerdictDistrictCourt-UrgendavStaat-24.06.2015.pdf

(3) https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/industry-news/the-law-page/canadian-courts-could-face-climate-change-cases-in-wake-of-dutch-ruling/article26360947/

(4) http://climatecasechart.com/

(5) https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/10-174.pdf

(6) https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/17288/index.do

(7) https://www.loc.gov/law/help/domestic-judgment/canada.php

(8) https://web.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/microsites/climate-change/white_paper_-_climate_change_in_the_courts_ _assessment_of_non_u.s._climate_litigation.pdf

Recent Posts

See All

Who We Are

Shake Up The Establishment is a youth-led, registered (#1190975-4) national non-partisan non-profit organization that operates within the geographical confines of what is currently known as "Canada", but what is referred to by its First Peoples, as Turtle Island. Indigenous peoples have inhabited Turtle Island for over 10,000 years, and were the sole inhabitants less than 500 years ago. We acknowledge that our address resides on Treaty 3 land, and is the traditional territory of the Erie, Neutral, Huron-Wendat, Haudenosaunee and Mississaugas Peoples. Turtle Island is still home to many Indigenous peoples and we at SUTE are thankful to be able to live, learn and work on this territory, whilst continuing to create meaningful change for the climate justice movement. We are aware that our actions as an organization and the work we put out have an impact on our land, and on all that inhabit it. We are humbled to be able to follow the lead of centuries long Indigenous-led efforts towards the protection and stewardship of this land and the people that inhabit it. We are committed to continually evaluating & decolonizing our practices, and we do our best to incorporate the lived experiences of the land defenders and protectors within our work. We also want to honour the voices of Black, and non-Black people of colour within our work, and continually recognize their resiliency in the face of years of systemic oppression as imposed by the Canadian state.


Our enterprise is inclusive of all folx who call the geographical confines of what is currently known as Canada, home, and we celebrate the horizontal learning that comes from our diverse identities. As an organization, we will try our utmost best to ensure that only individuals with lived experiences are speaking on behalf of their communities, while still recognizing that Black, Indigenous and communities of colour as well as the LGBTQ2S+ community, are not a monolith. We firmly believe in accountability, and commit to being as transparent as possible in our activism space; to research our topics well, support and centre community care, and minimize any harm, no matter the intent. We have strict policies and procedures to uphold these tenets, and update these on a yearly (or as-needed) basis.

106-325 Winterberry Drive, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8J 0B6

© 2020 Shake Up The Establishment

Stay Caught Up!

Sign up to receive our monthly newsletter for major political updates, our latest educational resources, events and more!